ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit vs Quadro P620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking524not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.97no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)R300 (2003−2008)
GPU code nameGP107R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 February 2018 (7 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512no data
Core clock speed1177 MHz380 MHz
Boost clock speed1443 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate46.183.040
Floating-point processing power1.478 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs328
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz300 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s9.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 February 2018 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 47 Watt

Quadro P620 has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 971.4% more advanced lithography process, and 17.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P620 and Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P620 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P620
Quadro P620
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit
Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 751 votes

Rate Quadro P620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P620 or Radeon 9800 PRO 128-bit, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.