Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P6000
38.47
+238%

Quadro P6000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by 238% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking110381
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money18.26no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 12 Xe (2020)
GPU code nameGP102iDG1LPDEV
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years old)31 October 2020 (3 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384096
Core clock speed1506 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate394.879.20
Floating-point performance12,634 gflopsno data

Size and compatibility

Information on Quadro P6000 and Iris Xe MAX Graphics compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitLPDDR4x
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed9016 MHz4266 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s68.26 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.2
CUDA6.1no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 38.47
+238%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 11.39

Quadro P6000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by 238% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P6000 14912
+657%
Iris Xe MAX Graphics 1971

Quadro P6000 outperforms Iris Xe MAX Graphics by 657% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+233%
27
−233%
1440p65−70
+225%
20
−225%
4K50−55
+213%
16
−213%

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 38.47 11.39
Recency 1 October 2016 31 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 25 Watt

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe MAX Graphics in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe MAX Graphics is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics
Iris Xe MAX Graphics

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 83 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 214 votes

Rate Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.