GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P102-101 Quadro P6000 Tesla P10 Tesla P40
VS
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 6GB Mobile RTX 3050 A Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q RTX 3050 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
39.55
+63%

P6000 outperforms RTX 3050 4GB Mobile by an impressive 63% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile RTX 3050 4GB

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking112236
Place by popularitynot in top-10056
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.45no data
Power efficiency10.9828.07
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP102GN20-P0
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (8 years ago)11 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402048
Core clock speed1506 MHz1238 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate394.8no data
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs240no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_2
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA6.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+56.3%
64
−56.3%
1440p75−80
+59.6%
47
−59.6%
4K45−50
+50%
30
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p59.99no data
1440p79.99no data
4K133.31no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+0%
71
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+0%
42
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 54
+0%
54
+0%
Battlefield 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%
Far Cry 5 68
+0%
68
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+0%
32
+0%
Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+0%
41
+0%
Dota 2 118
+0%
118
+0%
Far Cry 5 64
+0%
64
+0%
Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+0%
86
+0%
Metro Exodus 49
+0%
49
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+0%
81
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+0%
34
+0%
Dota 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Far Cry 5 61
+0%
61
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+0%
46
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 29
+0%
29
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+0%
44
+0%
Metro Exodus 17
+0%
17
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+0%
29
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+0%
35
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Far Cry 5 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and RTX 3050 4GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 56% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P6000 is 60% faster in 1440p
  • Quadro P6000 is 50% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 39.55 24.26
Recency 1 October 2016 11 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 60 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 63% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 316.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6600 Radeon Pro W6600
RTX 3050 4GB Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
vs
Arc A550M Arc A550M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro W6800X Duo Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Quadro P2000 Quadro P2000
vs
RTX 4060 AD106 4060 AD106
M3000 SE NVIDIA M3000 SE
vs
RX 7600 XT 7600 XT
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro 5300M 5300M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Tesla T10 T10
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
H100 SXM5 96 GB 96 GB
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RX Vega 3 Vega 3
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
vs
RX 560X 560X
Tesla P100 PCIe 12 GB NVIDIA P100 PCIe 12 GB
vs
RTX A500 Mobile A500 Mobile
Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB NVIDIA P100 PCIe 16 GB
vs
Data Center GPU Max Subsystem Center GPU Max Subsystem
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
vs
R5 M230 M230

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 96 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1458 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.