GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs Quadro P6000

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

Quadro P6000
38.47
+66%

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 66% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking110219
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money18.262.50
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP102GK110B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 October 2016 (7 years old)28 May 2014 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $2,999
Current price$989 (0.2x MSRP)$830 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P6000 has 630% better value for money than GTX TITAN Z.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38402880
CUDA coresno data5760
Core clock speed1506 MHz705 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors11,800 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate394.8338 billion/sec
Floating-point performance12,634 gflops2x 5,046 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2" (5.1 cm)3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinTwo 8-pin
SLI options+no data

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed9016 MHz7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/s672 GB/s

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDVI-D DP DP DP DP 3-pin StereoOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMIno data+
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+
ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P6000 38.47
+66%
GTX TITAN Z 23.18

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 66% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P6000 14912
+65.9%
GTX TITAN Z 8986

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 66% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro P6000 60145
+136%
GTX TITAN Z 25528

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 136% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro P6000 77095
+250%
GTX TITAN Z 22006

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 250% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P6000 47462
+158%
GTX TITAN Z 18422

Quadro P6000 outperforms GeForce GTX TITAN Z by 158% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 38.47 23.18
Recency 1 October 2016 28 May 2014
Cost $5999 $2999
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 375 Watt

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN Z in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX TITAN Z is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 83 votes

Rate NVIDIA Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.