GeForce GT 640M LE vs Quadro P6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
615 GT 415M GT 420M GT 425M GT 435M GT 520M GT 525M GT 540M GT 550M GT 620M GT 630M GT 640M LE

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P6000 with GeForce GT 640M LE, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P6000
2016, $5,999
24 GB 384-bit, 250 Watt
37.13
+2123%

P6000 outperforms 640M LE by a whopping 2123% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
GT 640M LE GT 640M LE

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141985
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.730.02
Power efficiency11.414.01
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP102GF108
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)4 May 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,999 $849.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Quadro P6000 has 8550% better value for money than GT 640M LE.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3840Up to 384
Core clock speed1506 MHzUp to 500 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHzno data
Number of transistors11,800 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate394.812.05
Floating-point processing power12.63 TFLOPS0.289 TFLOPS
ROPs964
TMUs24016
L1 Cache1.4 MB128 KB
L2 Cache3 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2" (5.1 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectors1 x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type384 BitDDR3\DDR5
Maximum RAM amount24 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128bit
Memory clock speed1127 MHz785 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 432 GB/sUp to 28.8 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Sync IIno data
HDMI-+
HDCP-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno dataUp to 2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray-+
Optimus-+
ECC (Error Correcting Code)+no data
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 API
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P6000 37.13
+2123%
GT 640M LE 1.67

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P6000 15530
+2125%
Samples: 162
GT 640M LE 698
Samples: 369

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 63928
+2620%
GT 640M LE 2350

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P6000 72082
+3118%
GT 640M LE 2240

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p400−450
+2005%
19
−2005%
Full HD450−500
+2043%
21
−2043%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.33
+204%
40.48
−204%
  • Quadro P6000 has 204% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how Quadro P6000 and GT 640M LE compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P6000 is 2005% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P6000 is 2043% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 52 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 37.13 1.67
Recency 1 October 2016 4 May 2012
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 20 Watt

Quadro P6000 has a 2123.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GT 640M LE, on the other hand, has 1150% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 640M LE in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P6000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 640M LE is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P6000
Quadro P6000
NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE
GeForce GT 640M LE
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
Pro Vega II Radeon Pro Vega II
GT 640M LE GeForce GT 640M LE
vs
HD 6550A Radeon HD 6550A
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
RTX 5000 Quadro RTX 5000
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Tesla M2075 M2075
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Tesla X2070 X2070
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Tesla X2090 X2090
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
Arc 7-Cores iGPU Cores iGPU
M3000 SE Quadro M3000 SE
vs
RTX 5060 Mobile 5060 Mobile
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GT 540M 540M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
R4 (Beema) (Beema)
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GT 520M 520M
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GTX 560 Ti 560 Ti
Quadro P6000 Quadro P6000
vs
GT 420M 420M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 119 votes

Rate Quadro P6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 62 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P6000 or GeForce GT 640M LE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.