Radeon PRO W7700 vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 and Radeon PRO W7700, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.43

PRO W7700 outperforms P600 by a whopping 595% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking50737
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.5874.08
Power efficiency14.8021.65
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGP107Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)13 November 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

PRO W7700 has 1026% better value for money than Quadro P600.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843072
Core clock speed1430 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz2600 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt190 Watt
Texture fill rate38.88499.2
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS31.95 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs24192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mm241 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent4x DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.76.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P600 8.43
PRO W7700 58.58
+595%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3317
PRO W7700 23050
+595%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
−594%
250−260
+594%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94
−23.7%
4.00
+23.7%
  • PRO W7700 has 24% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−586%
240−250
+586%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−594%
250−260
+594%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−586%
240−250
+586%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 120−130
−569%
850−900
+569%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Dota 2 81
−579%
550−600
+579%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−594%
250−260
+594%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33
−567%
200−210
+567%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−580%
170−180
+580%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
−586%
240−250
+586%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−588%
110−120
+588%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Dota 2 72
−594%
500−550
+594%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−592%
180−190
+592%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−594%
250−260
+594%
Forza Horizon 5 20−22
−550%
130−140
+550%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
−579%
95−100
+579%
Valorant 80−85
−571%
550−600
+571%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 45−50
−512%
300−310
+512%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
−545%
400−450
+545%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−582%
75−80
+582%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−590%
290−300
+590%
Valorant 90−95
−559%
600−650
+559%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
−567%
120−130
+567%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
−579%
95−100
+579%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
−547%
110−120
+547%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−584%
130−140
+584%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Valorant 40−45
−590%
290−300
+590%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10
−567%
60−65
+567%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Dota 2 27−30
−590%
200−210
+590%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
−592%
90−95
+592%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−567%
40−45
+567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 8−9
−588%
55−60
+588%

This is how Quadro P600 and PRO W7700 compete in popular games:

  • PRO W7700 is 594% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.43 58.58
Recency 7 February 2017 13 November 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 190 Watt

Quadro P600 has 375% lower power consumption.

PRO W7700, on the other hand, has a 594.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon PRO W7700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P600 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon PRO W7700
Radeon PRO W7700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 218 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 4 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P600 or Radeon PRO W7700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.