Radeon HD 8470D vs Quadro P600

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with Radeon HD 8470D, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.29
+782%

P600 outperforms HD 8470D by a whopping 782% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5031119
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.54no data
Power efficiency14.831.03
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGP107Scrapper
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)29 July 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed1430 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz850 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,303 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8810.20
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.3264 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs2412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length145 mmno data
Width1-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1252 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.29
+782%
HD 8470D 0.94

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3313
+786%
HD 8470D 374

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P600 4655
+445%
HD 8470D 854

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083
+509%
HD 8470D 670

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P600 28957
+419%
HD 8470D 5583

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+227%
11
−227%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Valorant 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Dota 2 27
+800%
3−4
−800%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Fortnite 50−55
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+1050%
2−3
−1050%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95
+692%
12−14
−692%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Valorant 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%
World of Tanks 120−130
+457%
21−24
−457%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+833%
3−4
−833%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Dota 2 72
+800%
8−9
−800%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+311%
9−10
−311%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+950%
2−3
−950%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+467%
12−14
−467%
Valorant 30−35
+967%
3−4
−967%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+1000%
1−2
−1000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+740%
5−6
−740%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8 0−1
World of Tanks 60−65
+1140%
5−6
−1140%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+800%
2−3
−800%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+1400%
1−2
−1400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Valorant 21−24
+267%
6−7
−267%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Dota 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Metro Exodus 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+733%
3−4
−733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+62.5%
8−9
−62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Dota 2 18−20
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Far Cry 5 10−11 0−1
Fortnite 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7 0−1
Valorant 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

This is how Quadro P600 and HD 8470D compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 227% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Fortnite, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P600 is 1600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P600 surpassed HD 8470D in all 37 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.29 0.94
Recency 7 February 2017 29 July 2013
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 65 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 781.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 8470D in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 8470D is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
AMD Radeon HD 8470D
Radeon HD 8470D

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 217 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 121 vote

Rate Radeon HD 8470D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.