GeForce GT 730 vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with GeForce GT 730, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.43
+298%

P600 outperforms GT 730 by a whopping 298% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking507872
Place by popularitynot in top-10034
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.510.19
Power efficiency14.883.05
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP107GF108
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)18 June 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 $59.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

Quadro P600 has 3326% better value for money than GT 730.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38496
Core clock speed1430 MHz700 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million585 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8811.2 GT/s
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.2688 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length145 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.1
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.12.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P600 8.43
+298%
GT 730 2.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P600 3316
+298%
GT 730 834

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P600 4083
+249%
GT 730 1170

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 10592
+265%
GT 730 2900

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Quadro P600 9751
+172%
GT 730 3590

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro P600 10634
+296%
GT 730 2682

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD36
+300%
9−10
−300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.94
+34.8%
6.67
−34.8%
  • Quadro P600 has 35% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
Valorant 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Dota 2 27
+350%
6−7
−350%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Fortnite 50−55
+325%
12−14
−325%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+343%
7−8
−343%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+360%
5−6
−360%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95
+352%
21−24
−352%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+300%
6−7
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+333%
6−7
−333%
Valorant 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%
World of Tanks 120−130
+327%
30−33
−327%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+325%
4−5
−325%
Dota 2 72
+300%
18−20
−300%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+300%
9−10
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+338%
8−9
−338%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+325%
16−18
−325%
Valorant 30−35
+300%
8−9
−300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Dota 2 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+310%
10−11
−310%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
World of Tanks 60−65
+343%
14−16
−343%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+300%
4−5
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+300%
3−4
−300%
Valorant 21−24
+340%
5−6
−340%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Metro Exodus 3−4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 2−3 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 0−1
Dota 2 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Fortnite 9−10
+350%
2−3
−350%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Valorant 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how Quadro P600 and GT 730 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 300% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.43 2.12
Recency 7 February 2017 18 June 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 49 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 297.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 22.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 730 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 730 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GeForce GT 730

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 217 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 6349 votes

Rate GeForce GT 730 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.