GeForce GT 630 OEM vs Quadro P600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P600 with GeForce GT 630 OEM, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P600
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
8.61
+416%

P600 outperforms GT 630 OEM by a whopping 416% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking499942
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.90no data
Power efficiency14.752.29
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP107GK107
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (7 years ago)24 April 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$178 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384192
Core clock speed1430 MHz875 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate38.8814.00
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS0.336 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs2416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm145 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1252 MHz891 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.13 GB/s28.51 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA6.13.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD34
+467%
6−7
−467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.24no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Hitman 3 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+433%
9−10
−433%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Battlefield 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Hitman 3 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+433%
9−10
−433%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+425%
4−5
−425%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+533%
3−4
−533%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+470%
10−11
−470%
Hitman 3 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+433%
9−10
−433%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+480%
10−11
−480%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 0−1
Far Cry 5 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+483%
6−7
−483%
Hitman 3 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+440%
10−11
−440%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Hitman 3 5−6 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+450%
6−7
−450%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%

This is how Quadro P600 and GT 630 OEM compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P600 is 467% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.61 1.67
Recency 7 February 2017 24 April 2012
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro P600 has a 415.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 630 OEM in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P600 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 630 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P600
Quadro P600
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 OEM
GeForce GT 630 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 212 votes

Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 28 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.