Tesla M2050 vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking232not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.36no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGP104GF100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)25 July 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560448
Core clock speed1556 MHz575 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million3,100 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate279.432.20
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS1.03 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs16056
L1 Cache960 KB896 KB
L2 Cache2 MB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz773 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s148.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.12.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro P5200 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 150% more advanced lithography process, and 125% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5200 and Tesla M2050. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Tesla M2050 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA Tesla M2050
Tesla M2050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 108 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Tesla M2050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or Tesla M2050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.