Radeon HD 7690M vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with Radeon HD 7690M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
26.62
+1286%

P5200 outperforms HD 7690M by a whopping 1286% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225909
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.427.73
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP104Thames
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)25 December 2011 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560480
Core clock speed1556 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHz725 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate279.417.40
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS0.696 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16024
L1 Cache960 KB48 KB
L2 Cache2 MB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s28.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P5200 26.62
+1286%
HD 7690M 1.92

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 Samples: 188 11771
+1290%
HD 7690M Samples: 30 847

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P5200 25100
+2100%
HD 7690M 1141

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P5200 65844
+1019%
HD 7690M 5884

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p300−350
+1100%
25
−1100%
Full HD120
+567%
18
−567%
4K48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+3925%
4−5
−3925%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2060%
5−6
−2060%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+3925%
4−5
−3925%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Fortnite 130−140
+1389%
9−10
−1389%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+918%
10−12
−918%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+936%
10−12
−936%
Valorant 180−190
+363%
40−45
−363%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2060%
5−6
−2060%
Counter-Strike 2 160−170
+3925%
4−5
−3925%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+545%
40−45
−545%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Dota 2 130−140
+500%
21−24
−500%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Fortnite 130−140
+1389%
9−10
−1389%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+918%
10−12
−918%
Forza Horizon 5 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+2425%
4−5
−2425%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+936%
10−12
−936%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+1375%
8−9
−1375%
Valorant 180−190
+363%
40−45
−363%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+2060%
5−6
−2060%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1500%
4−5
−1500%
Dota 2 130−140
+500%
21−24
−500%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+918%
10−12
−918%
Hogwarts Legacy 60−65
+771%
7−8
−771%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+936%
10−12
−936%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
+713%
8−9
−713%
Valorant 180−190
+363%
40−45
−363%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 130−140
+1389%
9−10
−1389%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+1180%
5−6
−1180%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+1329%
14−16
−1329%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+821%
18−20
−821%
Valorant 220−230
+1380%
14−16
−1380%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+1460%
5−6
−1460%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Far Cry 5 65−70
+2133%
3−4
−2133%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+1420%
5−6
−1420%
Hogwarts Legacy 30−35
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+1533%
3−4
−1533%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 70−75
+1675%
4−5
−1675%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+250%
16−18
−250%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+1433%
3−4
−1433%
Valorant 170−180
+1610%
10−11
−1610%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+1400%
3−4
−1400%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+1400%
2−3
−1400%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Dota 2 90−95
+2150%
4−5
−2150%
Far Cry 5 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Hogwarts Legacy 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 30−35
+1000%
3−4
−1000%

This is how Quadro P5200 and HD 7690M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 1100% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P5200 is 567% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P5200 is 1500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 5300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5200 surpassed HD 7690M in all 55 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.62 1.92
Recency 21 February 2018 25 December 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 20 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 1286.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7690M, on the other hand, has 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7690M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7690M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
AMD Radeon HD 7690M
Radeon HD 7690M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 108 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 10 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7690M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or Radeon HD 7690M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.