GeForce GT 330M vs Quadro P5200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5200 with GeForce GT 330M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P5200
2018
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
31.41
+5509%

P5200 outperforms GT 330M by a whopping 5509% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1791216
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.671.68
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGP104GT216
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)10 January 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256048
Core clock speed1556 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million486 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt23 Watt
Texture fill rate279.410.00
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS0.06528 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data182
ROPs648
TMUs16016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount16 GB1 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHzUp to 1066 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s25.28 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P5200 31.41
+5509%
GT 330M 0.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P5200 12077
+5491%
GT 330M 216

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P5200 65844
+2378%
GT 330M 2658

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p550−600
+5400%
10
−5400%
Full HD114
+571%
17
−571%
4K460−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+589%
9−10
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Elden Ring 100−110
+10500%
1−2
−10500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+589%
9−10
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2300%
6−7
−2300%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
Valorant 120−130
+6150%
2−3
−6150%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+589%
9−10
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Dota 2 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Elden Ring 100−110
+10500%
1−2
−10500%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1143%
7−8
−1143%
Fortnite 140−150 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2300%
6−7
−2300%
Grand Theft Auto V 100−110
+10200%
1−2
−10200%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 216
+2600%
8−9
−2600%
Red Dead Redemption 2 65−70
+1200%
5−6
−1200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+2020%
5−6
−2020%
Valorant 120−130
+6150%
2−3
−6150%
World of Tanks 270−280
+1524%
16−18
−1524%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 90−95
+9000%
1−2
−9000%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+589%
9−10
−589%
Cyberpunk 2077 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Dota 2 100−110
+10300%
1−2
−10300%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+1143%
7−8
−1143%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+2300%
6−7
−2300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 84
+950%
8−9
−950%
Valorant 120−130
+6150%
2−3
−6150%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 55−60 0−1
Elden Ring 55−60
+5800%
1−2
−5800%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+5733%
3−4
−5733%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33 0−1
World of Tanks 200−210
+20100%
1−2
−20100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+6000%
1−2
−6000%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+222%
9−10
−222%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+1350%
2−3
−1350%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+2350%
4−5
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+8600%
1−2
−8600%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+6900%
1−2
−6900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2400%
2−3
−2400%
Valorant 90−95
+1720%
5−6
−1720%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33 0−1
Dota 2 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Elden Ring 27−30 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Metro Exodus 24−27 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+9200%
1−2
−9200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 30−33 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%
Dota 2 55−60
+287%
14−16
−287%
Far Cry 5 40−45 0−1
Fortnite 40−45 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Valorant 45−50
+4500%
1−2
−4500%

This is how Quadro P5200 and GT 330M compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P5200 is 5400% faster in 900p
  • Quadro P5200 is 571% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P5200 is 20100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, Quadro P5200 surpassed GT 330M in all 33 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 31.41 0.56
Recency 21 February 2018 10 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 23 Watt

Quadro P5200 has a 5508.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

GT 330M, on the other hand, has 334.8% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5200 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 330M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GT 330M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5200
Quadro P5200
NVIDIA GeForce GT 330M
GeForce GT 330M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 94 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 122 votes

Rate GeForce GT 330M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.