FirePro M8900 vs Quadro P5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking240not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency20.77no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGP104Blackcomb
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date21 February 2018 (8 years ago)12 April 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560960
Core clock speed1556 MHz680 MHz
Boost clock speed1746 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate279.432.64
Floating-point processing power8.94 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs16048
L1 Cache960 KB192 KB
L2 Cache2 MB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-B (3.0)
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth230.4 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 February 2018 12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 75 Watt

Quadro P5200 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.

FirePro M8900, on the other hand, has 33% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P5200 and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 109 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P5200 or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.