GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	160	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	18.35
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP104	N18P-G62
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	21 February 2018 (6 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	no data	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	1024
Core clock speed	1316 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1569 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	251.0	95.04

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P5200 Max-Q and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7216 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	230.9 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5200 Max-Q 31.99
+58.4%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 58% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

P5200 Max-Q 12355
+58.5%

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796

Quadro P5200 Max-Q outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile by 58% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	90−95 +55.2%	58 −55.2%
1440p	70−75 +48.9%	47 −48.9%
4K	35−40 +52.2%	23 −52.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

59
+68.6%

35−40

−68.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	61 +74.3%	35−40 −74.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	49 +63.3%	30−33 −63.3%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +65%	40−45 −65%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	53 +76.7%	30−33 −76.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	46 +70.4%	27−30 −70.4%
Far Cry 5	69 +72.5%	40−45 −72.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	84 +68%	50−55 −68%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Hitman 3	51 +70%	30−33 −70%
Horizon Zero Dawn	115 +64.3%	70−75 −64.3%
Metro Exodus	91 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +63%	27−30 −63%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	95 +72.7%	55−60 −72.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	60 +71.4%	35−40 −71.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	46 +70.4%	27−30 −70.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	32 +77.8%	18−20 −77.8%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +65%	40−45 −65%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +74.1%	27−30 −74.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +71.4%	21−24 −71.4%
Far Cry 5	58 +65.7%	35−40 −65.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	59 +68.6%	35−40 −68.6%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Hitman 3	45 +66.7%	27−30 −66.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	180 +63.6%	110−120 −63.6%
Metro Exodus	68 +70%	40−45 −70%
Red Dead Redemption 2	42 +75%	24−27 −75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	75 +66.7%	45−50 −66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	72 +60%	45−50 −60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	183 +66.4%	110−120 −66.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27 +68.8%	16−18 −68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	15 +66.7%	9−10 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 +72.2%	18−20 −72.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	34 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Far Cry 5	39 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 +65.5%	55−60 −65.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn	64 +60%	40−45 −60%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +80%	35−40 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	22 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

41
+70.8%

24−27

−70.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +66.7%	24−27 −66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +75%	12−14 −75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +62.5%	16−18 −62.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	16 +60%	10−11 −60%
Far Cry 5	30−35 +61.9%	21−24 −61.9%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +62.5%	24−27 −62.5%
Hitman 3	28 +75%	16−18 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +70.8%	24−27 −70.8%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +81%	21−24 −81%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +75%	24−27 −75%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +64.3%	14−16 −64.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +75%	8−9 −75%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+83.3%

18−20

−83.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	20−22 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	20 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Hitman 3	16 +60%	10−11 −60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	18 +80%	10−11 −80%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	25 +78.6%	14−16 −78.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 +66.7%	6−7 −66.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +83.3%	6−7 −83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 +100%	3−4 −100%
Far Cry 5	12 +71.4%	7−8 −71.4%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +75%	16−18 −75%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +83.3%	12−14 −83.3%
Metro Exodus	18−20 +90%	10−11 −90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	8−9 +60%	5−6 −60%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+80%

10−11

−80%

This is how P5200 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

P5200 Max-Q is 55% faster in 1080p
P5200 Max-Q is 49% faster in 1440p
P5200 Max-Q is 52% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	31.99	20.19
Recency	21 February 2018	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt