Radeon Vega 7 vs Quadro P5000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P5000 Mobile with Radeon Vega 7, including specs and performance data.

P5000 Mobile
2017
16 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
29.97
+302%

P5000 Mobile outperforms Vega 7 by a whopping 302% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking188531
Place by popularitynot in top-10039
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.26no data
Power efficiency20.8411.53
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Cezanne
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)13 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,885 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048448
Core clock speed1278 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1582 MHz1900 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate202.553.20
Floating-point processing power6.48 TFLOPS1.702 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs12828

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount16 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P5000 Mobile 29.97
+302%
Vega 7 7.46

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P5000 Mobile 20096
+283%
Vega 7 5249

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P5000 Mobile 14666
+338%
Vega 7 3348

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P5000 Mobile 86679
+251%
Vega 7 24726

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P5000 Mobile 3883
+276%
Vega 7 1032

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

P5000 Mobile 99
+191%
Vega 7 34

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

P5000 Mobile 159
+169%
Vega 7 59

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

P5000 Mobile 168
+346%
Vega 7 38

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

P5000 Mobile 150
+334%
Vega 7 35

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

P5000 Mobile 126
+366%
Vega 7 27

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

P5000 Mobile 65
+411%
Vega 7 13

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

P5000 Mobile 67
+250%
Vega 7 19

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

P5000 Mobile 15
+753%
Vega 7 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85−90
+286%
22
−286%
1440p120−130
+275%
32
−275%
4K60−65
+275%
16
−275%

Cost per frame, $

1080p22.18no data
1440p15.71no data
4K31.42no data

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 29.97 7.46
Recency 11 January 2017 13 April 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 45 Watt

P5000 Mobile has a 301.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Vega 7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 122.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P5000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Vega 7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P5000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Vega 7 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P5000 Mobile
Quadro P5000 Mobile
AMD Radeon Vega 7
Radeon Vega 7

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 85 votes

Rate Quadro P5000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 1986 votes

Rate Radeon Vega 7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.