GMA 3150 vs Quadro P4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GMA 3000 GMA 3100 GMA 3150 GMA X3000 GMA X3100

Contents

Share:
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
GMA 3150 GMA 3150

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2661605
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency17.81no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGP104Pineview
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)9 May 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230416
Core clock speed1227 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speed1647 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million123 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm45 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate237.20.8
Floating-point processing power7.589 TFLOPS0.0128 TFLOPS
ROPs641
TMUs1442
L1 Cache864 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCI
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1502 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)9.0c
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P4200 10379
+518850%
Samples: 146
GMA 3150 2
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Counter-Strike 2 130−140 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Forza Horizon 5 70−75 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 85−90 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
Metro Exodus 50−55 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 no data
Dota 2 120−130 no data
Far Cry 5 75−80 no data
Forza Horizon 4 90−95 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 no data
Valorant 160−170 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 50−55 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 200−210 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 50−55 no data
Forza Horizon 4 60−65 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 55−60 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 20−22 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40 no data
Valorant 130−140 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 35−40 no data
Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Far Cry 5 27−30 no data
Forza Horizon 4 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 24−27 no data

Pros & cons summary

Recency 21 February 2018 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 16 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 13 Watt

Quadro P4200 has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 181.3% more advanced lithography process.

GMA 3150, on the other hand, has 669.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4200 and GMA 3150. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GMA 3150 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200
Quadro P4200
Intel GMA 3150
GMA 3150
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
GMA 3150 GMA 3150
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2400 XT Mobility Radeon HD 2400 XT
Quadro P4200 Quadro P4200
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB Tesla V100 DGXS 32 GB
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
Tesla PG503-216 Tesla PG503-216
RX 560X Mobile RX 560X Mobile
vs
CMP 100HX-210 CMP 100HX-210
FirePro S9010 S9010
vs
RX 5770 RX 5770
FirePro S9010 S9010
vs
PRO W9070 PRO W9070
Quadro P4200 P4200
vs
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh
Quadro P4200 P4200
vs
RTX A500 RTX A500
Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 FHHL
vs
RX 580X Mobile RX 580X Mobile
Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 FHHL
vs
RX 570X Mobile RX 570X Mobile
Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 FHHL
vs
RX 550X Mobile RX 550X Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.2 81 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 174 votes

Rate GMA 3150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4200 or GMA 3150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.