GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile vs Quadro P4200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P4200 Quadro P5200
VS
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P4200 Max-Q with GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

P4200 Max-Q
2018
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
28.89
+62.2%

P4200 Max-Q outperforms GTX 1650 Mobile by an impressive 62% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P4200 Max-Q P4200 Max-Q
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking194304
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Power efficiency20.6825.49
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU117
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)15 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1215 MHz1380 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate213.199.84
Floating-point processing power6.82 TFLOPS3.195 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)6.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.2.140
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4200 Max-Q 28.89
+62.2%
GTX 1650 Mobile 17.81

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4200 Max-Q 11544
+62.2%
GTX 1650 Mobile 7116

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95−100
+61%
59
−61%
1440p55−60
+52.8%
36
−52.8%
4K35−40
+52.2%
23
−52.2%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 38
+0%
38
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+0%
52
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+0%
35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 83
+0%
83
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
+0%
28
+0%
Dota 2 72
+0%
72
+0%
Far Cry 5 62
+0%
62
+0%
Fortnite 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+0%
64
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 34
+0%
34
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+0%
59
+0%
Metro Exodus 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+0%
165
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Valorant 47
+0%
47
+0%
World of Tanks 130
+0%
130
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
+0%
25
+0%
Dota 2 89
+0%
89
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+0%
55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 39
+0%
39
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
World of Tanks 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+0%
37
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 23
+0%
23
+0%
Metro Exodus 39
+0%
39
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
+0%
47
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+0%
17
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+0%
6
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Fortnite 23
+0%
23
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

This is how P4200 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • P4200 Max-Q is 61% faster in 1080p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 53% faster in 1440p
  • P4200 Max-Q is 52% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 28.89 17.81
Recency 21 February 2018 15 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

P4200 Max-Q has a 62.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GTX 1650 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P4200 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P4200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Max-Q
Quadro P4200 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
P5000 Mobile Quadro P5000 Mobile
GTX 1650 Mobile GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Arc 8 Core iGPU
P4200 Max-Q Quadro P4200 Max-Q
vs
Pro Vega 48 Radeon Pro Vega 48
RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB HD Graphics 4600
vs
HD Graphics 4600 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) GeForce GT 520M
vs
GT 520M UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) Radeon HD 8330
vs
HD 8330 UHD Graphics 24EUs (Alder Lake-N)
RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 5000 Ada Generation Mobile
RX 7600 Radeon R7 M460
vs
R7 M460 Radeon RX 7600
A800 SXM4 80 GB Radeon PRO W7900
vs
PRO W7900 A800 SXM4 80 GB
RX 470 Arc 8 Core iGPU
vs
Arc 8-Core iGPU Radeon RX 470
GTX 1630 Radeon RX 7900 GRE
vs
RX 7900 GRE GeForce GTX 1630
Arc A770 Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Arc A770
Arc A380 L4
vs
L4 Arc A380

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro P4200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 3383 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.