Tesla M2090 vs Quadro P4000

Place in performance ranking	172	430
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	25.20	0.52
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code name	GP104	GF110
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	6 February 2017 (7 years ago)	25 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$815	no data
Current price	$485 (0.6x MSRP)	$1844

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P4000 has 4746% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1792	512
Core clock speed	1202 MHz	651 MHz
Boost clock speed	1480 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	7,200 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	165.8	41.66
Floating-point performance	5,304 gflops	1,331.2 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	241 mm	248 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	7604 MHz	3696 MHz
Memory bandwidth	192 GB/s	177.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	no data
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	+	N/A
CUDA	6.1	2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P4000 30.10
+218%

Tesla M2090 9.47

Quadro P4000 outperforms Tesla M2090 by 218% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro P4000 102
+108%

Tesla M2090 49

Quadro P4000 outperforms Tesla M2090 by 108% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

68
+224%

21−24

−224%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

50−55
+219%

16−18

−219%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +248%	27−30 −248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +238%	24−27 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +219%	16−18 −219%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +225%	24−27 −225%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +223%	30−33 −223%
Hitman 3	90−95 +244%	27−30 −244%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +261%	18−20 −261%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +250%	14−16 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +229%	21−24 −229%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +248%	27−30 −248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +238%	24−27 −238%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +219%	16−18 −219%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +225%	24−27 −225%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +223%	30−33 −223%
Hitman 3	90−95 +244%	27−30 −244%
Horizon Zero Dawn	65−70 +261%	18−20 −261%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +225%	16−18 −225%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 +250%	14−16 −250%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +229%	21−24 −229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	77 +221%	24−27 −221%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%
Battlefield 5	90−95 +248%	27−30 −248%
Cyberpunk 2077	50−55 +219%	16−18 −219%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +225%	24−27 −225%
Far Cry New Dawn	75−80 +221%	24−27 −221%
Forza Horizon 4	95−100 +223%	30−33 −223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	41 +242%	12−14 −242%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +256%	16−18 −256%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	45−50 +243%	14−16 −243%
Hitman 3	50−55 +225%	16−18 −225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	40−45 +242%	12−14 −242%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +244%	9−10 −244%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +229%	7−8 −229%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−35 +230%	10−11 −230%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−35 +244%	9−10 −244%
Battlefield 5	65−70 +267%	18−20 −267%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +231%	16−18 −231%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +222%	18−20 −222%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +250%	18−20 −250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +225%	12−14 −225%
Watch Dogs: Legion	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24−27 +257%	7−8 −257%
Hitman 3	27−30 +222%	9−10 −222%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +250%	6−7 −250%
Metro Exodus	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +267%	6−7 −267%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +240%	10−11 −240%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +300%	2−3 −300%
Far Cry 5	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +233%	9−10 −233%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +250%	12−14 −250%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 +250%	4−5 −250%

This is how Quadro P4000 and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

Quadro P4000 is 224% faster than Tesla M2090 in 1080p

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	30.10	9.47
Recency	6 February 2017	25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	250 Watt