Radeon R9 390X2 vs Quadro P4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking229not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.77no data
Power efficiency19.85no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN (2012−2015)
GPU code nameGP104no data
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$815 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922
Core clock speed1202 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1480 MHz1000 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate165.8no data
Floating-point processing power5.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs112no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5512
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bit5400 Bit
Memory clock speed1901 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth192 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12GDDR5
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 and Radeon R9 390X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R9 390X2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Quadro P4000
AMD Radeon R9 390X2
Radeon R9 390X2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 343 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R9 390X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 or Radeon R9 390X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.