Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics vs Quadro P4000
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro P4000 with Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics, including specs and performance data.
P4000 outperforms HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics by a whopping 1685% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 241 | 1001 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.50 | no data |
| Power efficiency | 19.91 | no data |
| Architecture | Pascal (2016−2021) | Terascale 3 (2010−2013) |
| GPU code name | GP104 | no data |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 6 February 2017 (8 years ago) | 15 May 2012 (13 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 1792 | 736 |
| Core clock speed | 1202 MHz | 655 / 600 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 7,200 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 165.8 | no data |
| Floating-point processing power | 5.304 TFLOPS | no data |
| ROPs | 64 | no data |
| TMUs | 112 | no data |
| L1 Cache | 672 KB | no data |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | no data | medium sized |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | no data |
| Length | 241 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1901 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | no data |
| Display Port | 1.4 | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
| 3D Stereo | + | no data |
| Mosaic | + | no data |
| nView Display Management | + | no data |
| Optimus | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | + | - |
| CUDA | 6.1 | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| 900p | 400−450
+1639%
| 23
−1639%
|
| Full HD | 65
+282%
| 17
−282%
|
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 12.54 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+15600%
|
1−2
−15600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+1967%
|
3−4
−1967%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+883%
|
6−7
−883%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+15600%
|
1−2
−15600%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+1967%
|
3−4
−1967%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+2520%
|
5−6
−2520%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+1111%
|
9−10
−1111%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 85−90
+4300%
|
2−3
−4300%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+883%
|
6−7
−883%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+1010%
|
10−11
−1010%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+420%
|
35−40
−420%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 150−160
+15600%
|
1−2
−15600%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 270−280
+514%
|
44
−514%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+1967%
|
3−4
−1967%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+584%
|
18−20
−584%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| Fortnite | 130−140
+2520%
|
5−6
−2520%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+1111%
|
9−10
−1111%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 85−90
+4300%
|
2−3
−4300%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 95−100
+4850%
|
2−3
−4850%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+883%
|
6−7
−883%
|
| Metro Exodus | 60−65
+3050%
|
2−3
−3050%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+1010%
|
10−11
−1010%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 77
+1000%
|
7−8
−1000%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+420%
|
35−40
−420%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 100−110
+3433%
|
3−4
−3433%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 60−65
+1967%
|
3−4
−1967%
|
| Dota 2 | 130−140
+584%
|
18−20
−584%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 90−95
+2150%
|
4−5
−2150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 100−110
+1111%
|
9−10
−1111%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+883%
|
6−7
−883%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 110−120
+1010%
|
10−11
−1010%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 41
+486%
|
7−8
−486%
|
| Valorant | 180−190
+420%
|
35−40
−420%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 130−140
+2520%
|
5−6
−2520%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 60−65
+1450%
|
4−5
−1450%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 190−200
+1850%
|
10−11
−1850%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+2550%
|
2−3
−2550%
|
| Metro Exodus | 35−40
+1800%
|
2−3
−1800%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+1067%
|
14−16
−1067%
|
| Valorant | 210−220
+2638%
|
8−9
−2638%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 75−80
+1800%
|
4−5
−1800%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 65−70
+3150%
|
2−3
−3150%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 70−75
+1725%
|
4−5
−1725%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 30−35
+3000%
|
1−2
−3000%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 45−50
+2250%
|
2−3
−2250%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 65−70
+2200%
|
3−4
−2200%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 50−55
+260%
|
14−16
−260%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| Metro Exodus | 24−27
+2300%
|
1−2
−2300%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 40−45
+2000%
|
2−3
−2000%
|
| Valorant | 160−170
+1975%
|
8−9
−1975%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+2050%
|
2−3
−2050%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 27−30
+2800%
|
1−2
−2800%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| Dota 2 | 85−90
+4300%
|
2−3
−4300%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−35
+3300%
|
1−2
−3300%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 45−50
+2350%
|
2−3
−2350%
|
| Hogwarts Legacy | 18−20
+1700%
|
1−2
−1700%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+1450%
|
2−3
−1450%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 30−35
+967%
|
3−4
−967%
|
This is how Quadro P4000 and HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics compete in popular games:
- Quadro P4000 is 1639% faster in 900p
- Quadro P4000 is 282% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike 2, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the Quadro P4000 is 15600% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Without exception, Quadro P4000 surpassed HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in all 53 of our tests.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 25.88 | 1.45 |
| Recency | 6 February 2017 | 15 May 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Quadro P4000 has a 1684.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 150% more advanced lithography process.
The Quadro P4000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro P4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7520G + HD 7670M Dual Graphics is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
