Quadro M1000M vs P4000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

P4000 Mobile
2017
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
21.44
+189%

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by a whopping 189% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking238502
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.070.84
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2018)
GPU code nameN17E-Q3GM107
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)2 October 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$819.61 $200.89
Current price$1053 (1.3x MSRP)$706 (3.5x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

P4000 Mobile has 623% better value for money than M1000M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792512
Core clock speed1202 MHz993 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHz1072 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate137.431.78
Floating-point performance4,398 gflops1,017 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P4000 Mobile and Quadro M1000M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB/4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed6006 MHz5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.41.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus++
3D Vision Prono data+
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic++
nView Display Management++
Optimus++

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA6.15.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P4000 Mobile 21.44
+189%
M1000M 7.43

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by 189% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

P4000 Mobile 15433
+265%
M1000M 4230

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by 265% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P4000 Mobile 12259
+251%
M1000M 3498

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by 251% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

P4000 Mobile 53834
+130%
M1000M 23422

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by 130% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

Benchmark coverage: 2%

P4000 Mobile 67
+229%
M1000M 20

P4000 Mobile outperforms M1000M by 229% in SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD100−110
+170%
37
−170%
4K30−35
+150%
12
−150%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.44 7.43
Recency 11 January 2017 2 October 2015
Cost $819.61 $200.89
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB/4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 40 Watt

The Quadro P4000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M1000M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Mobile
Quadro P4000 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M1000M
Quadro M1000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 23 votes

Rate Quadro P4000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 469 votes

Rate Quadro M1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.