FirePro W6150M vs Quadro P400

Place in performance ranking	639	550
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.79	1.30
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code name	GP107	Saturn
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	12 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$119.99	no data
Current price	$73 (0.6x MSRP)	$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

W6150M has 65% better value for money than Quadro P400.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	768
Core clock speed	1228 MHz	1075 MHz
Boost clock speed	1252 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	20.03	51.60
Floating-point performance	679.9 gflops	1,651 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro P400 and FirePro W6150M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4008 MHz	5500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	32.06 GB/s	88 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

3x mini-DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	6.4	6.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P400 4.24

W6150M 6.09
+43.6%

FirePro W6150M outperforms Quadro P400 by 44% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro P400 1640

W6150M 2358
+43.8%

FirePro W6150M outperforms Quadro P400 by 44% in Passmark.