UHD Graphics P750 vs Quadro P3200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 with UHD Graphics P750, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P3200
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
22.74
+399%

P3200 outperforms UHD Graphics P750 by a whopping 399% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking244647
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.0021.05
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameGP104Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792256
Core clock speed1328 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1543 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate172.883.20
Floating-point processing power5.53 TFLOPS0.6656 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs11264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)Ring Bus
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1753 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P3200 22.74
+399%
UHD Graphics P750 4.56

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P3200 8775
+399%
UHD Graphics P750 1758

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD84
+425%
16−18
−425%
4K28
+460%
5−6
−460%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+442%
12−14
−442%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+407%
27−30
−407%
Hitman 3 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+410%
21−24
−410%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+464%
14−16
−464%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+438%
24−27
−438%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
+450%
16−18
−450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+436%
14−16
−436%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+407%
27−30
−407%
Hitman 3 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+410%
21−24
−410%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+464%
14−16
−464%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+450%
14−16
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+400%
10−11
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+400%
8−9
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+457%
7−8
−457%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+429%
7−8
−429%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+430%
10−11
−430%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+414%
14−16
−414%
Hitman 3 45−50
+411%
9−10
−411%
Horizon Zero Dawn 100−110
+410%
21−24
−410%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 75−80
+450%
14−16
−450%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+411%
9−10
−411%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+450%
18−20
−450%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+400%
12−14
−400%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+450%
8−9
−450%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+400%
7−8
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+500%
4−5
−500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+420%
5−6
−420%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+442%
24−27
−442%
Hitman 3 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+422%
9−10
−422%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+438%
8−9
−438%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+444%
9−10
−444%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+450%
24−27
−450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+443%
7−8
−443%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Hitman 3 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+462%
21−24
−462%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 28
+460%
5−6
−460%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+417%
6−7
−417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%

This is how Quadro P3200 and UHD Graphics P750 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P3200 is 425% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P3200 is 460% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.74 4.56
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro P3200 has a 398.7% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics P750, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3200 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P750 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics P750 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3200
Quadro P3200
Intel UHD Graphics P750
UHD Graphics P750

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 292 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.6 64 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P750 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.