Radeon RX 7900 XT vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7400 7600 7600 XT 7650 GRE 7700 XT 7800 XT 7900 GRE 7900 XT 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Radeon RX 7900 XT, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
21.60

7900 XT outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
RX 7900 XT RX 7900 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking29221
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.33
Power efficiency22.2017.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP104Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)3 November 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17925376
Core clock speed1139 MHz1387 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2394 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2804.4
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS51.48 TFLOPS
ROPs64192
TMUs112336
Ray Tracing Coresno data84
L0 Cacheno data2.6 MB
L1 Cache672 KB3 MB
L2 Cache1536 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data80 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data276 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB20 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s800.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3200 Max-Q 21.60
RX 7900 XT 69.03
+220%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q 9077
Samples: 143
RX 7900 XT 29004
+220%
Samples: 5673

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD60−65
−232%
199
+232%
1440p40−45
−238%
135
+238%
4K24−27
−254%
85
+254%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.52
1440pno data6.66
4Kno data10.58

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 237
+0%
237
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 288
+0%
288
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 212
+0%
212
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 196
+0%
196
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 244
+0%
244
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 268
+0%
268
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
+0%
190
+0%
Dota 2 199
+0%
199
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 187
+0%
187
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 223
+0%
223
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 173
+0%
173
+0%
Metro Exodus 146
+0%
146
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 483
+0%
483
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 179
+0%
179
+0%
Dota 2 184
+0%
184
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 280−290
+0%
280−290
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 255
+0%
255
+0%
Valorant 400−450
+0%
400−450
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 206
+0%
206
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 159
+0%
159
+0%
Metro Exodus 135
+0%
135
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 122
+0%
122
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 173
+0%
173
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 179
+0%
179
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 50
+0%
50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 175
+0%
175
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Far Cry 5 132
+0%
132
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RX 7900 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900 XT is 232% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900 XT is 238% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900 XT is 254% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 21.60 69.03
Recency 21 February 2018 3 November 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 20 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 300 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 300% lower power consumption.

RX 7900 XT, on the other hand, has a 219.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 233.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7900 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT
Radeon RX 7900 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
vs
RTX 5070 GeForce RTX 5070
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Pro V7350X2 AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
vs
RTX 4000 Ada Generation RTX 4000 Ada Generation
Pro V7350X2 AMD Radeon Pro V7350X2
vs
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
ATI V8700 Duo ATI FirePro V8700 Duo
vs
RX Vega 9 RX Vega 9
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX Vega 56 Mobile RX Vega 56 Mobile
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 6600 XT RX 6600 XT
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 7700 XT RX 7700 XT
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Radeon 740M Radeon 740M
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 7900 GRE RX 7900 GRE
P3200 Max-Q NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 26 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2473 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Radeon RX 7900 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.