GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

Quadro P3000 Mobile Quadro P3200 Quadro P4200 Quadro P5200
VS
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
23.61

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a significant 28% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking241190
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.6425.95
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104TU106B
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date21 February 2018 (6 years ago)29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17922304
Core clock speed1139 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2170.6
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs6464
TMUs112144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA6.17.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3200 Max-Q 23.61
RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.20
+27.9%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q 9077
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11609
+27.9%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75−80
−32%
99
+32%
1440p40−45
−42.5%
57
+42.5%
4K30−35
−36.7%
41
+36.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+0%
76
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Metro Exodus 93
+0%
93
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 150
+0%
150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Dota 2 102
+0%
102
+0%
Elden Ring 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 83
+0%
83
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 68
+0%
68
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
+0%
214
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+0%
48
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 64
+0%
64
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+0%
23
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 129
+0%
129
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 78
+0%
78
+0%
Valorant 129
+0%
129
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Elden Ring 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 29
+0%
29
+0%
World of Tanks 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+0%
55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 72
+0%
72
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 95
+0%
95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100
+0%
100
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+0%
19
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 69
+0%
69
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 55
+0%
55
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 32% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 37% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 23.61 30.20
Recency 21 February 2018 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 80 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 6.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 2070 Max-Q, on the other hand, has a 27.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RX Vega Mobile Radeon RX Vega Mobile
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Pro Vega 64 Radeon Pro Vega 64
vs
RX Vega 56 Mobile Radeon RX Vega 56 Mobile
GTX 750 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
vs
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
GTX 750 Ti OEM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
vs
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
RTX 2060 RTX 2060
vs
RTX 4080 Ti Mobile 4080 Ti Mobile
Tesla T4 Tesla T4
vs
Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile Arc Graphics 128EU Mobile
P2000 Max-Q Quadro P2000 Max-Q
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
ATI HD 4250 IGP Radeon HD 4250 IGP
vs
8200M G mGPU GeForce 8200M G mGPU AMD
GMA 3100 GMA 3100
vs
RTX 3050 OEM GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 21 vote

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 358 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.