Arc A770 vs Quadro P3200 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5000 X2 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q Tesla P6 Mobile
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5 A550M 7 A730M 7 A770M 7 A780 A580 A750 A770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3200 Max-Q with Arc A770, including specs and performance data.

P3200 Max-Q
2018
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
20.63

Arc A770 outperforms P3200 Max-Q by a considerable 46% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
P3200 Max-Q P3200 Max-Q
Arc A770 Arc A770

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data51.00
Power efficiency22.1410.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP104DG2-512
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date21 February 2018 (7 years ago)12 October 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17924096
Core clock speed1139 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speed1404 MHz2400 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate157.2614.4
Floating-point processing power5.032 TFLOPS19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs64128
TMUs112256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cache672 KBno data
L2 Cache1536 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB16 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth168.3 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3200 Max-Q 20.63
Arc A770 30.02
+45.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3200 Max-Q Samples: 138 9124
Arc A770 Samples: 1367 13276
+45.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70−75
−52.9%
107
+52.9%
1440p40−45
−57.5%
63
+57.5%
4K24−27
−62.5%
39
+62.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.07
1440pno data5.22
4Kno data8.44

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 125
+0%
125
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 139
+0%
139
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 74
+0%
74
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 62
+0%
62
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 27
+0%
27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how P3200 Max-Q and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 53% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 58% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A770 is 63% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.63 30.02
Recency 21 February 2018 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 225 Watt

P3200 Max-Q has 200% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 45.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 166.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Arc A770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Quadro P3200 Max-Q
Intel Arc A770
Arc A770
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
Pro 5600M Radeon Pro 5600M
Arc A770 Arc A770
vs
RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5600 XT
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
vs
P4000 Max-Q Quadro P4000 Max-Q
RTX 4500 Ada Generation RTX 4500 Ada Generation
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
520 Mobile GDDR5 Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5
vs
M5000 SE Quadro M5000 SE
RTX 3050 Mobile GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
vs
FirePro M3100 FirePro M3100
RTX 3050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
vs
FirePro M3100 FirePro M3100
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB
vs
FirePro M3100 FirePro M3100
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
vs
P3200 Max-Q Quadro P3200 Max-Q
RX 5700M Radeon RX 5700M
vs
R7 M265DX Radeon R7 M265DX
RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT
vs
R7 M270DX Radeon R7 M270DX
ROG Ally Extreme GPU ROG Ally Extreme GPU
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
RX 6700 XT Radeon RX 6700 XT
vs
R2 Mobile Graphics Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.7 25 votes

Rate Quadro P3200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5459 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3200 Max-Q or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.