ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with Radeon HD 4650 AGP, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.12
+2986%

P3000 Mobile outperforms HD 4650 AGP by a whopping 2986% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3801293
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.630.79
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGP104RV730
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)10 September 2008 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1280320
Core clock speed1088 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt48 Watt
Texture fill rate97.2019.20
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs488
TMUs8032
L1 Cache480 KB64 KB
L2 Cache1536 KB128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1210.1 (10_1)
Shader Model6.44.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3000 Mobile 15.12
+2986%
ATI HD 4650 AGP 0.49

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6384
+2984%
Samples: 292
ATI HD 4650 AGP 207
Samples: 3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
4K280−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Fortnite 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Valorant 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Counter-Strike 2 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+3300%
6−7
−3300%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Dota 2 95−100
+3100%
3−4
−3100%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Fortnite 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+4700%
1−2
−4700%
Grand Theft Auto V 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Valorant 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Dota 2 95−100
+3100%
3−4
−3100%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+3050%
2−3
−3050%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+5700%
1−2
−5700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Valorant 120−130
+3050%
4−5
−3050%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+4250%
2−3
−4250%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−33 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+3733%
3−4
−3733%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 18−20 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+3625%
4−5
−3625%
Valorant 150−160
+3020%
5−6
−3020%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+4300%
1−2
−4300%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+3300%
1−2
−3300%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3700%
1−2
−3700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24 0−1

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30 0−1
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 0−1
Valorant 85−90
+4200%
2−3
−4200%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 12−14 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 55−60
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Escape from Tarkov 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 16−18 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16 0−1

4K
Epic

Fortnite 14−16 0−1

This is how P3000 Mobile and ATI HD 4650 AGP compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 3100% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.12 0.49
Recency 11 January 2017 10 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 48 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 2985.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 243.8% more advanced lithography process.

ATI HD 4650 AGP, on the other hand, has 56.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 4650 AGP in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 4650 AGP is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000 Mobile
ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP
Radeon HD 4650 AGP

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 198 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 23 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4650 AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Mobile or Radeon HD 4650 AGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.