GeForce RTX 4090 D vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

Place in the ranking	324	13
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	14.05
Power efficiency	15.52	12.11
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	GP104	AD102
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	11 January 2017 (8 years ago)	28 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1280	14592
Core clock speed	1088 MHz	2280 MHz
Boost clock speed	1215 MHz	2520 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	425 Watt
Texture fill rate	97.20	1,149
Floating-point processing power	3.11 TFLOPS	73.54 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	176
TMUs	80	456
Tensor Cores	no data	456
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	114

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	304 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	1753 MHz	1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth	168 GB/s	1,008 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+
Display Port	1.4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.7
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	6.1	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P3000 Mobile 16.87

RTX 4090 D 74.60
+342%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6486

RTX 4090 D 28686
+342%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	65 −331%	280−290 +331%
4K	31 −319%	130−140 +319%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.71
4K	no data	12.30

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Elden Ring	50−55 −323%	220−230 +323%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −326%	230−240 +326%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −335%	300−310 +335%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −335%	200−210 +335%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −325%	170−180 +325%
Valorant	65−70 −341%	300−310 +341%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −326%	230−240 +326%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Dota 2	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Elden Ring	50−55 −323%	220−230 +323%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Fortnite	90−95 −335%	400−450 +335%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −335%	300−310 +335%
Grand Theft Auto V	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −335%	200−210 +335%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −324%	500−550 +324%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −325%	170−180 +325%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −323%	220−230 +323%
Valorant	65−70 −341%	300−310 +341%
World of Tanks	200−210 −331%	900−950 +331%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 −326%	230−240 +326%
Counter-Strike 2	30−33 −333%	130−140 +333%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−35 −324%	140−150 +324%
Dota 2	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −333%	260−270 +333%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −335%	300−310 +335%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110−120 −324%	500−550 +324%
Valorant	65−70 −341%	300−310 +341%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	24−27 −340%	110−120 +340%
Elden Ring	27−30 −307%	110−120 +307%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −323%	110−120 +323%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	150−160 −314%	650−700 +314%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −333%	65−70 +333%
World of Tanks	110−120 −327%	500−550 +327%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −341%	150−160 +341%
Counter-Strike 2	14−16 −329%	60−65 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 −329%	180−190 +329%
Metro Exodus	35−40 −321%	160−170 +321%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 −332%	95−100 +332%
Valorant	40−45 −342%	190−200 +342%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Dota 2	27−30 −314%	120−130 +314%
Elden Ring	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
Grand Theft Auto V	27−30 −314%	120−130 +314%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −317%	50−55 +317%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	50−55 −340%	220−230 +340%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −309%	45−50 +309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −314%	120−130 +314%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 −338%	70−75 +338%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −323%	55−60 +323%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Dota 2	27−30 −314%	120−130 +314%
Far Cry 5	21−24 −329%	90−95 +329%
Fortnite	20−22 −325%	85−90 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −317%	100−105 +317%
Valorant	18−20 −321%	80−85 +321%

This is how P3000 Mobile and RTX 4090 D compete in popular games:

RTX 4090 D is 331% faster in 1080p
RTX 4090 D is 319% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	16.87	74.60
Recency	11 January 2017	28 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	425 Watt

P3000 Mobile has 466.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 D, on the other hand, has a 342.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 D is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P3000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 D is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.