GeForce 9700M GT vs Quadro P3000 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P3000 Mobile with GeForce 9700M GT, including specs and performance data.

P3000 Mobile
2017
6 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.79
+3009%

P3000 Mobile outperforms 9700M GT by a whopping 3009% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3331235
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency15.450.83
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP104G96
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)29 July 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128032
Core clock speed1088 MHz625 MHz
Boost clock speed1215 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate97.2010.00
Floating-point processing power3.11 TFLOPS0.0992 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data148
ROPs488
TMUs8016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)MXM-II

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount6 GB512 MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1753 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth168 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.2.131N/A
CUDA6.1+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

P3000 Mobile 16.79
+3009%
9700M GT 0.54

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P3000 Mobile 6492
+3021%
9700M GT 208

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P3000 Mobile 33390
+1809%
9700M GT 1750

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+3100%
2−3
−3100%
4K280−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Fortnite 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%
Valorant 120−130
+354%
27−30
−354%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+1112%
16−18
−1112%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Dota 2 95−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Fortnite 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
Grand Theft Auto V 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Metro Exodus 30−35 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 63
+1475%
4−5
−1475%
Valorant 120−130
+354%
27−30
−354%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+3250%
2−3
−3250%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+314%
7−8
−314%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Dota 2 95−100
+782%
10−12
−782%
Far Cry 5 50−55
+5300%
1−2
−5300%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+1550%
4−5
−1550%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+4200%
1−2
−4200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+729%
7−8
−729%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+725%
4−5
−725%
Valorant 120−130
+354%
27−30
−354%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+11600%
1−2
−11600%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27 0−1
Metro Exodus 20−22 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+5067%
3−4
−5067%
Valorant 150−160
+3080%
5−6
−3080%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+4400%
1−2
−4400%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+3400%
1−2
−3400%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+93.3%
14−16
−93.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22 0−1
Valorant 85−90
+2833%
3−4
−2833%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 7−8 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 55−60
+5500%
1−2
−5500%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Forza Horizon 5 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%

This is how P3000 Mobile and 9700M GT compete in popular games:

  • P3000 Mobile is 3100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the P3000 Mobile is 11600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P3000 Mobile surpassed 9700M GT in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.79 0.54
Recency 11 January 2017 29 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 45 Watt

P3000 Mobile has a 3009.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.

9700M GT, on the other hand, has 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9700M GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 9700M GT is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile
Quadro P3000
NVIDIA GeForce 9700M GT
GeForce 9700M GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 163 votes

Rate Quadro P3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9700M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P3000 Mobile or GeForce 9700M GT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.