Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB vs Quadro P2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking281not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.01no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGP106Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 June 2019 (6 years ago)13 April 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,499

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12804480
Core clock speed1000 MHz1895 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2525 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt281 Watt
Texture fill rate119.4707.0
Floating-point processing power3.822 TFLOPS45.25 TFLOPS
ROPs40128
TMUs80280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70
L0 Cacheno data2.2 MB
L1 Cache480 KB2 MB
L2 Cache1280 KB6 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mm280 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount5 GB48 GB
Memory bus width160 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth200.2 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort3x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 June 2019 13 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 281 Watt

Quadro P2200 has 274.7% lower power consumption.

PRO W7800 48 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 860% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2200 and Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2200
Quadro P2200
AMD Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB
Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 437 votes

Rate Quadro P2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 5 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2200 or Radeon PRO W7800 48 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.