Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 vs Quadro P2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking348not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.65no data
Power efficiency17.74no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Fahrenheit (1998−2000)
GPU code nameGP106NV5 B6
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (8 years ago)22 March 1999 (26 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed1076 MHz100 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million15 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm250 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate94.720.2
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPSno data
ROPs402
TMUs642
L1 Cache384 KBno data
L2 Cache1280 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 4x
Length201 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5SDR
Maximum RAM amount5 GB16 MB
Memory bus width160 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz133 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s1.064 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)6.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.2
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 February 2017 22 March 1999
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 16 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 250 nm

Quadro P2000 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1462.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P2000 and Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16
Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 746 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P2000 or Riva TNT2 M64 Vanta-16, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.