GeForce 8600 GT vs Quadro P2000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 with GeForce 8600 GT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P2000
2017
5 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
18.90
+5806%

P2000 outperforms 8600 GT by a whopping 5806% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking2971313
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.63no data
Power efficiency17.390.47
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameGP106G84
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 February 2017 (7 years ago)17 April 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$585 $159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro P2000 and 8600 GT have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores102432
Core clock speed1076 MHz540 MHz
Boost clock speed1480 MHzno data
Number of transistors4,400 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate94.728.640
Floating-point processing power3.031 TFLOPS0.07616 TFLOPS
ROPs408
TMUs6416

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length201 mm170 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount5 GB512 MB
Standard memory config per GPUno data256 MB
Memory bus width160 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1752 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth140.2 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.44.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.11.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P2000 18.90
+5806%
8600 GT 0.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P2000 7268
+5809%
8600 GT 123

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD580−1
1440p20-0−1
4K17-0−1

Cost per frame, $

1080p10.09no data
1440p29.25no data
4K34.41no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Elden Ring 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 0−1
Valorant 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 34 0−1
Elden Ring 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Far Cry 5 72
+7100%
1−2
−7100%
Fortnite 100−110
+10000%
1−2
−10000%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+6600%
1−2
−6600%
Metro Exodus 50−55 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 137
+6750%
2−3
−6750%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 0−1
Valorant 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%
World of Tanks 220−230
+7367%
3−4
−7367%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40 0−1
Dota 2 98
+9700%
1−2
−9700%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40 0−1
Valorant 75−80
+7500%
1−2
−7500%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30 0−1
Elden Ring 30−35 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−33 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+8300%
2−3
−8300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18 0−1
World of Tanks 120−130
+6350%
2−3
−6350%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 16−18 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 50−55 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 0−1
Metro Exodus 40−45 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27 0−1
Valorant 45−50 0−1

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Elden Ring 14−16 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35 0−1
Metro Exodus 14−16 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20 0−1
Counter-Strike 2 14−16 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7 0−1
Dota 2 30−35 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Fortnite 21−24 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 27−30 0−1
Valorant 21−24 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.90 0.32
Recency 6 February 2017 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 5 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 47 Watt

Quadro P2000 has a 5806.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

8600 GT, on the other hand, has 59.6% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P2000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8600 GT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000
Quadro P2000
NVIDIA GeForce 8600 GT
GeForce 8600 GT

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 656 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 1039 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.