UHD Graphics 630 vs Quadro P2000 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P2000 Max-Q with UHD Graphics 630, including specs and performance data.

P2000 Max-Q
2017
4 GB GDDR5
13.66
+342%

P2000 Max-Q outperforms UHD Graphics 630 by a whopping 342% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking377758
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Power efficiencyno data14.24
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGP107GLComet Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date5 July 2017 (7 years ago)1 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768184
Core clock speed1215 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1150 MHz
Number of transistorsno data189 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data26.45
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4232 TFLOPS
ROPsno data3
TMUsno data23

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x1
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed6008 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.1
Vulkan-1.1.103

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

P2000 Max-Q 13.66
+342%
UHD Graphics 630 3.09

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P2000 Max-Q 5270
+342%
UHD Graphics 630 1192

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

P2000 Max-Q 8148
+355%
UHD Graphics 630 1790

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

P2000 Max-Q 32724
+325%
UHD Graphics 630 7704

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

P2000 Max-Q 6742
+457%
UHD Graphics 630 1211

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Max-Q 28679
+193%
UHD Graphics 630 9798

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

P2000 Max-Q 326075
+207%
UHD Graphics 630 106362

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

P2000 Max-Q 2049
+394%
UHD Graphics 630 415

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD47
+194%
16
−194%
1440p40−45
+300%
10
−300%
4K21
+200%
7
−200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+320%
5
−320%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+357%
7
−357%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+350%
10
−350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+357%
7
−357%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+322%
9
−322%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+200%
30
−200%
Hitman 3 24−27
+333%
6
−333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+209%
21−24
−209%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+254%
13
−254%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+322%
9
−322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 72
+350%
16
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+150%
30
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+800%
5−6
−800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+233%
27
−233%
Hitman 3 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+209%
21−24
−209%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+1050%
4−5
−1050%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+275%
12
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+487%
15
−487%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+168%
28
−168%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+256%
9−10
−256%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+300%
7−8
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+433%
6−7
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+429%
16−18
−429%
Hitman 3 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+209%
21−24
−209%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+309%
11
−309%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+92.3%
35−40
−92.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+375%
8−9
−375%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+440%
5−6
−440%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+320%
5−6
−320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+400%
14−16
−400%
Hitman 3 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+250%
8−9
−250%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
+380%
5−6
−380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+353%
18−20
−353%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Hitman 3 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+386%
14−16
−386%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12
+500%
2−3
−500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%

This is how P2000 Max-Q and UHD Graphics 630 compete in popular games:

  • P2000 Max-Q is 194% faster in 1080p
  • P2000 Max-Q is 300% faster in 1440p
  • P2000 Max-Q is 200% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the P2000 Max-Q is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, P2000 Max-Q surpassed UHD Graphics 630 in all 62 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.66 3.09
Recency 5 July 2017 1 October 2017

P2000 Max-Q has a 342.1% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 months.

The Quadro P2000 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P2000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 630 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Quadro P2000 Max-Q
Intel UHD Graphics 630
UHD Graphics 630

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 15 votes

Rate Quadro P2000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3817 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.