ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4651591
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.30no data
Power efficiency20.62no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP107RV280
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1493 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate48.610.8
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs164
TMUs324
L1 Cache192 KBno data
L2 Cache1024 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16AGP 8x
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Module1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro P1000 4495
+224650%
Samples: 3160
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43no data
4K11no data

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.72no data
4K34.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Escape from Tarkov 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 32 no data
Fortnite 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike 2 60−65 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Escape from Tarkov 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 29 no data
Fortnite 65−70 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 5 30−35 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 21−24 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Dota 2 75−80 no data
Escape from Tarkov 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16 no data
Valorant 100−105 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 21−24 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18 no data
Metro Exodus 12−14 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70 no data
Valorant 110−120 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Escape from Tarkov 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 21−24 no data
Forza Horizon 4 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24 no data
Metro Exodus 7−8 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14 no data
Valorant 55−60 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16 no data
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4 no data
Dota 2 40−45 no data
Escape from Tarkov 10−11 no data
Far Cry 5 10−12 no data
Forza Horizon 4 18−20 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 February 2017 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 28 Watt

Quadro P1000 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P1000 and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 686 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.