ATI Radeon 9200 SE vs Quadro P4000 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking3001607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.21no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameGP104RV280
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (9 years ago)1 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1792no data
Core clock speed1114 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speed1228 MHzno data
Number of transistors7,200 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate137.50.8
Floating-point processing power4.401 TFLOPSno data
ROPs644
TMUs1124
L1 Cache672 KBno data
L2 Cache2 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount8 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s2.656 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)8.1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.61.4
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

P4000 Max-Q 8815
+440650%
Samples: 2
ATI 9200 SE 2
Samples: 78

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95no data
4K33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 no data

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 5 65−70 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Counter-Strike 2 120−130 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Fortnite 110−120 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Forza Horizon 5 65−70 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 no data
Metro Exodus 45−50 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50 no data
Dota 2 110−120 no data
Far Cry 5 70−75 no data
Forza Horizon 4 85−90 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 40−45 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 42 no data
Valorant 150−160 no data

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 110−120 no data

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50 no data
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 150−160 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40 no data
Metro Exodus 27−30 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 no data
Valorant 190−200 no data

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60−65 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24 no data
Far Cry 5 45−50 no data
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35 no data

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 50−55 no data

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
Metro Exodus 18−20 no data
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29 no data
Valorant 120−130 no data

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 30−35 no data
Counter-Strike 2 20−22 no data
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 no data
Dota 2 70−75 no data
Far Cry 5 24−27 no data
Forza Horizon 4 35−40 no data
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16 no data
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24 no data

4K
Epic

Fortnite 21−24 no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 16 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 28 Watt

P4000 Max-Q has an age advantage of 13 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 837.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9200 SE, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro P4000 Max-Q and Radeon 9200 SE. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro P4000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 9200 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P4000 Max-Q
Quadro P4000 Max-Q
ATI Radeon 9200 SE
Radeon 9200 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro P4000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 71 votes

Rate Radeon 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P4000 Max-Q or Radeon 9200 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.