Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Quadro P1000

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
11.38
+114%

P1000 outperforms Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) by a whopping 114% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking422620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.70no data
Power efficiency19.9814.94
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGP107Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores64064
Core clock speed1493 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate48.61no data
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
WidthMXM Moduleno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1502 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.7no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA6.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro P1000 11.38
+114%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.32

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P1000 6001
+43.3%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P1000 24240
+67.8%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787
+74.5%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P1000 30721
+83.8%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 16713

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P1000 1395
+76.4%
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 791

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
+144%
18
−144%
4K11
+120%
5−6
−120%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.52no data
4K34.09no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+80%
15
−80%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+125%
12
−125%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+167%
18
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Far Cry 5 32
+167%
12
−167%
Fortnite 65−70
+103%
32
−103%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+262%
13
−262%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
Valorant 100−105
+61.3%
60−65
−61.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+125%
12−14
−125%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+200%
16
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+310%
39
−310%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Dota 2 75−80
+153%
30
−153%
Far Cry 5 29
+190%
10
−190%
Fortnite 65−70
+160%
25
−160%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+367%
9
−367%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+340%
5
−340%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+66.7%
18
−66.7%
Valorant 100−105
+61.3%
60−65
−61.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+129%
21−24
−129%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+66.7%
12−14
−66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Dota 2 75−80
+171%
28
−171%
Far Cry 5 27
+145%
11
−145%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+104%
21−24
−104%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+164%
10−12
−164%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+105%
18−20
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Valorant 100−105
+61.3%
60−65
−61.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+333%
15
−333%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+113%
35−40
−113%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+225%
4−5
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 60−65
+82.4%
30−35
−82.4%
Valorant 120−130
+111%
55−60
−111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+117%
12−14
−117%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+138%
8−9
−138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+130%
10−11
−130%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+29.4%
16−18
−29.4%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+133%
3−4
−133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Valorant 55−60
+123%
24−27
−123%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Dota 2 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how Quadro P1000 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 144% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 120% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 1200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is ahead in 63 tests (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.38 5.32
Recency 7 February 2017 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 12 Watt

Quadro P1000 has a 113.9% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)
Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 589 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 241 vote

Rate Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.