Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) vs Quadro P1000

Place in the ranking	417	619
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	5.62	no data
Power efficiency	20.03	15.00
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	Ice Lake G7 Gen. 11
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	7 February 2017 (7 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$375	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	64
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1519 MHz	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	48.61	no data
Floating-point processing power	1.555 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	no data
Length	145 mm	no data
Width	MXM Module	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	1502 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	96.13 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

Portable Device Dependent

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12_1
Shader Model	6.7	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	3.0	no data
Vulkan	1.3	-
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro P1000 11.11
+114%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 5.20

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro P1000 6001
+43.3%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 4187

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro P1000 24240
+67.8%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 14442

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro P1000 4787
+74.5%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 2743

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Quadro P1000 30721
+83.8%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 16713

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro P1000 1395
+76.4%

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) 791

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	46 +156%	18 −156%
4K	11 +120%	5−6 −120%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	8.15	no data
4K	34.09	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +124%	21 −124%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +88.2%	17 −88.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +150%	12 −150%
Valorant	45−50 +283%	12 −283%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Dota 2	40−45 +163%	16 −163%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +188%	16 −188%
Fortnite	41 +28.1%	30−35 −28.1%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +176%	17 −176%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
Grand Theft Auto V	40−45 +367%	9 −367%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +146%	12−14 −146%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	103 +115%	48 −115%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 +87.5%	16−18 −87.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +106%	16−18 −106%
Valorant	45−50 +360%	10 −360%
World of Tanks	160−170 +315%	39 −315%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 +124%	16−18 −124%
Counter-Strike 2	20−22 +81.8%	10−12 −81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +109%	10−12 −109%
Dota 2	40−45 +50%	28 −50%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +188%	16 −188%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 +213%	15 −213%
Forza Horizon 5	30−33 +173%	10−12 −173%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +91.3%	45−50 −91.3%
Valorant	45−50 +171%	16−18 −171%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 +167%	6−7 −167%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	85−90 +153%	30−35 −153%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
World of Tanks	80−85 +113%	35−40 −113%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +156%	9−10 −156%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 +80%	5−6 −80%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +136%	10−12 −136%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +200%	9−10 −200%
Forza Horizon 5	18−20 +157%	7−8 −157%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +380%	5−6 −380%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +87.5%	8−9 −87.5%
Valorant	27−30 +93.3%	14−16 −93.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Metro Exodus	7−8 +250%	2−3 −250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−35 +113%	16−18 −113%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +150%	4−5 −150%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 +50%	2−3 −50%
Dota 2	21−24 +29.4%	16−18 −29.4%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +133%	6−7 −133%
Fortnite	12−14 +160%	5−6 −160%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 +220%	5−6 −220%
Forza Horizon 5	8−9 +167%	3−4 −167%
Valorant	12−14 +140%	5−6 −140%

This is how Quadro P1000 and Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) compete in popular games:

Quadro P1000 is 156% faster in 1080p
Quadro P1000 is 120% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P1000 is 380% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P1000 is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.11	5.20
Recency	7 February 2017	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	40 Watt	12 Watt

Quadro P1000 has a 113.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.