GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs Quadro P1000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P1000 P2000 Mobile P2000 Max-Q P3000 Mobile P3000 Max-Q P3200 P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P5000 Mobile P5200 P5200 Max-Q
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
745 OEM 750 750 GM206 750 Ti 750 Ti OEM 750 v2 760 760 OEM 760 OEM Rebrand 760 Ti OEM 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 760 X2 770 780 780 6 GB 780 Rev. 2 780 Ti 780 Ti 6 GB

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro P1000 with GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2, including specs and performance data.

Quadro P1000
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 40 Watt
10.20
+10.6%

P1000 outperforms GTX 780 Rev. 2 by a moderate 11% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GTX 780 Rev. 2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking457476
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.221.05
Power efficiency20.522.97
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP107GK110B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 February 2017 (8 years ago)10 September 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$375 $649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Quadro P1000 has 111% better value for money than GTX 780 Rev. 2.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402304
Core clock speed1493 MHz863 MHz
Boost clock speed1519 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate48.61173.2
Floating-point processing power1.555 TFLOPS4.156 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs32192
L1 Cache192 KB192 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length145 mm267 mm
WidthMXM Module2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth96.13 GB/s288.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.75.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.01.2
Vulkan1.31.1.126
CUDA6.13.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
4K11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p8.72
+113%
18.54
−113%
4K34.09
+112%
72.11
−112%
  • Quadro P1000 has 113% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 has 112% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Far Cry 5 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
Valorant 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+14.3%
140−150
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Far Cry 5 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Valorant 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+20%
40−45
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 75−80
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Far Cry 5 27
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+17.5%
40−45
−17.5%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+11.4%
35−40
−11.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Valorant 100−105
+11.1%
90−95
−11.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 65−70
+18.2%
55−60
−18.2%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+10.7%
75−80
−10.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
Valorant 110−120
+19%
100−105
−19%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Valorant 55−60
+16%
50−55
−16%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+25%
4−5
−25%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Dota 2 40−45
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

This is how Quadro P1000 and GTX 780 Rev. 2 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro P1000 is 23% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro P1000 is 22% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 10.20 9.22
Recency 7 February 2017 10 September 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

Quadro P1000 has a 10.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 525% lower power consumption.

The Quadro P1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro P1000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Quadro M2200 Quadro M2200
GTX 780 Rev. 2 GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2
vs
GTX 480 GeForce GTX 480
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
RX 7800 XT RX 7800 XT
vs
FirePro D700 D700
RX 6700 XT RX 6700 XT
vs
FirePro W8000 W8000
NVS 210S NVS 210S
vs
FirePro V3900 V3900
GTX 745 OEM GTX 745 OEM
vs
FirePro V4900 V4900
PRO V710 PRO V710
vs
ATI V7800P V7800P
Graphics 448SP Graphics 448SP
vs
Quadro P400 P400
K5000M K5000M
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
FX 570 FX 570
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
Pro 5600M Pro 5600M
vs
Quadro P2000 P2000
HD Graphics 3000 HD Graphics 3000
vs
Quadro M5000 M5000

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 651 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro P1000 or GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.