Radeon RX 6400 vs Quadro NVS 5100M

Place in the ranking	1121	276
Place by popularity	not in top-100	100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	53.42
Power efficiency	1.85	25.92
Architecture	GT2xx (2010)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	N10P-NS	Navi 24
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	7 January 2010 (14 years ago)	19 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$159

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	768
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1923 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2321 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	53 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	111.4
Floating-point processing power	no data	3.565 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	32
TMUs	no data	48
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x4
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	800 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.2
Vulkan	-	1.3

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

3−4

−1900%

60−65
+1900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1983%	250−260 +1983%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1997%	650−700 +1997%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −1900%	40−45 +1900%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1983%	250−260 +1983%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2000%	210−220 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1997%	650−700 +1997%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100−105 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1983%	250−260 +1983%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −2000%	210−220 +2000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	30−35 −1997%	650−700 +1997%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

1−2

−2000%

21−24
+2000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	0−1	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1900%	80−85 +1900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −1900%	60−65 +1900%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−1900%

60−65
+1900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn

0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2000%	21−24 +2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1900%

40−45
+1900%

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.93	19.71
Recency	7 January 2010	19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	53 Watt

NVS 5100M has 51.4% lower power consumption.

RX 6400, on the other hand, has a 2019.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6400 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6400 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.