ATI Radeon HD 5450 vs Quadro NVS 5100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 5100M with Radeon HD 5450, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
0.95
+171%

NVS 5100M outperforms ATI HD 5450 by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11231290
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.871.27
ArchitectureGT2xx (2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameN10P-NSCedar
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)4 February 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4880
Core clock speed550 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistorsno data292 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt19 Watt
Texture fill rateno data5.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.104 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data6.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.111.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Fortnite 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
World of Tanks 21−24
+188%
8−9
−188%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
World of Tanks 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3 0−1
Valorant 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Valorant 1−2 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.95 0.35
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 19 Watt

NVS 5100M has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score.

ATI HD 5450, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 84.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro NVS 5100M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 5450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon HD 5450 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M
ATI Radeon HD 5450
Radeon HD 5450

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 1210 votes

Rate Radeon HD 5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.