Quadro T1000 vs NVS 5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregated performance score

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB DDR3
0.92

T1000 outperforms NVS 5100M by a whopping 1748% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1081295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.048.57
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameN10P-NSTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)27 May 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price$105 $920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro T1000 has 21325% better value for money than NVS 5100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed550 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro NVS 5100M and Quadro T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHz8000 MHz
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%

Full HD
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Hitman 3 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−1733%
110−120
+1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Hitman 3 1−2
−1700%
18−20
+1700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−1614%
120−130
+1614%

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 3−4
−1733%
55−60
+1733%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−1700%
90−95
+1700%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.92 17.00
Recency 7 January 2010 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 301 vote

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.