Quadro T1000 vs Quadro NVS 5100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 5100M with Quadro T1000, including specs and performance data.

NVS 5100M
2010
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
0.87

T1000 outperforms 5100M by a whopping 1686% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1185375
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9123.90
ArchitectureGT2xx (2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameN10P-NSTU117
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)27 May 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48no data
Core clock speed550 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1455 MHz
Number of transistorsno data4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt50 Watt

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 MHz8000 MHz
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.112.0 (12_1)
OpenGLno data4.6

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
Valorant 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−1639%
400−450
+1639%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Dota 2 14−16
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Fortnite 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Valorant 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Dota 2 14−16
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Hogwarts Legacy 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−1650%
140−150
+1650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1567%
100−105
+1567%
Valorant 30−33
−1567%
500−550
+1567%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 0−1 0−1

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−1567%
50−55
+1567%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1678%
160−170
+1678%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%
Hogwarts Legacy 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−1500%
16−18
+1500%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1686%
250−260
+1686%
Valorant 5−6
−1600%
85−90
+1600%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1650%
35−40
+1650%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.87 15.54
Recency 7 January 2010 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 50 Watt

NVS 5100M has 42.9% lower power consumption.

Quadro T1000, on the other hand, has a 1686.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, and a 233.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro T1000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 5100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 5100M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 5100M
Quadro NVS 5100M
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 538 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 5100M or Quadro T1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.