Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB vs Quadro NVS 450

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 450 with Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, including specs and performance data.

NVS 450
2008
256 MB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.16

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB outperforms NVS 450 by a whopping 29863% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking145772
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data86.51
Power efficiency0.3514.54
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG98Navi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$163.14 $334

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

NVS 450 and RX 6750 GRE 12 GB have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×22560
Core clock speed480 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors210 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate1.920 ×2413.0
Floating-point processing power0.0192 TFLOPS ×213.21 TFLOPS
ROPs4 ×264
TMUs4 ×2160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×212 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×2432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 450 0.16
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 47.94
+29863%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 450 66
RX 6750 GRE 12 GB 20169
+30459%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 47.94
Recency 11 November 2008 17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 250 Watt

NVS 450 has 614.3% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, on the other hand, has a 29862.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 450 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 450 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 450
Quadro NVS 450
AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB
Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 12 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 198 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 450 or Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.