Quadro NVS 285 vs Quadro NVS 420

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 420 and Quadro NVS 285, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 420
2009, $131
256 MB GDDR3, 40 Watt
0.32
+220%

NVS 420 outperforms NVS 285 by a whopping 220% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13621509
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.620.43
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG98NV44 A2
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date20 January 2009 (16 years ago)6 June 2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$131.43 $27.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8 ×2no data
Core clock speed550 MHz275 MHz
Number of transistors210 million75 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate4.400 ×21.100
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs4 ×22
TMUs8 ×24
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB ×2128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit ×2128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s ×28 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 420 0.32
+220%
NVS 285 0.10

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 420 137
+219%
Samples: 44
NVS 285 43
Samples: 148

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.32 0.10
Recency 20 January 2009 6 June 2006
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 18 Watt

NVS 420 has a 220% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 69.2% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 285, on the other hand, has 122.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro NVS 420 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 285 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 420
Quadro NVS 420
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 9 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 420 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 420 or Quadro NVS 285, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.