GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile vs Quadro NVS 320M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro NVS 320M with GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.
5090 Mobile outperforms 320M by a whopping 14109% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 1281 | 22 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | 1.89 | 56.60 |
Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
GPU code name | G84 | GB203 |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Release date | 9 June 2007 (18 years ago) | 27 March 2025 (less than a year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 10496 |
Core clock speed | 575 MHz | 990 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 1515 MHz |
Number of transistors | 289 million | 45,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 95 Watt |
Texture fill rate | 9.200 | 496.9 |
Floating-point processing power | 0.0736 TFLOPS | 31.8 TFLOPS |
ROPs | 8 | 112 |
TMUs | 16 | 328 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 328 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 82 |
L1 Cache | no data | 10.3 MB |
L2 Cache | 32 KB | 64 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Laptop size | large | large |
Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR7 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 24 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 896.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |
CUDA | 1.1 | 12.0 |
DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 1−2
−16700%
| 168
+16700%
|
1440p | 0−1 | 115 |
4K | 0−1 | 79 |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−18000%
|
180−190
+18000%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3200%
|
160−170
+3200%
|
Full HD
Medium
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−18000%
|
180−190
+18000%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−7100%
|
280−290
+7100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3200%
|
160−170
+3200%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2088%
|
170−180
+2088%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−1456%
|
400−450
+1456%
|
Full HD
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−1535%
|
270−280
+1535%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−18000%
|
180−190
+18000%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
−13991%
|
1550−1600
+13991%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−7100%
|
280−290
+7100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3200%
|
160−170
+3200%
|
Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 180−190 |
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2088%
|
170−180
+2088%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−6180%
|
300−350
+6180%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−1456%
|
400−450
+1456%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−18000%
|
180−190
+18000%
|
Dota 2 | 10−12
−13991%
|
1550−1600
+13991%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−7100%
|
280−290
+7100%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 5−6
−3200%
|
160−170
+3200%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−2088%
|
170−180
+2088%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
−4280%
|
219
+4280%
|
Valorant | 27−30
−13974%
|
3800−3850
+13974%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−7367%
|
224
+7367%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 1−2
−51500%
|
500−550
+51500%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 5−6
−13900%
|
700−750
+13900%
|
1440p
Ultra
Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−12550%
|
250−260
+12550%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 0−1 | 95−100 |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2
−16700%
|
168
+16700%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 0−1 | 150−160 |
4K
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−1073%
|
176
+1073%
|
Valorant | 3−4
−10900%
|
300−350
+10900%
|
4K
Ultra
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−4700%
|
95−100
+4700%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 2−3
−3850%
|
75−80
+3850%
|
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 390
+0%
|
390
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Counter-Strike 2 | 301
+0%
|
301
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 172
+0%
|
172
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 200−210
+0%
|
200−210
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 300−350
+0%
|
300−350
+0%
|
1440p
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 157
+0%
|
157
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Valorant | 450−500
+0%
|
450−500
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 180−190
+0%
|
180−190
+0%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 100−110
+0%
|
100−110
+0%
|
Metro Exodus | 80−85
+0%
|
80−85
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 122
+0%
|
122
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Far Cry 5 | 120−130
+0%
|
120−130
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 210−220
+0%
|
210−220
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 55−60
+0%
|
55−60
+0%
|
This is how NVS 320M and RTX 5090 Mobile compete in popular games:
- RTX 5090 Mobile is 16700% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 Mobile is 51500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- RTX 5090 Mobile performs better in 27 tests (48%)
- there's a draw in 29 tests (52%)
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 0.47 | 66.78 |
Recency | 9 June 2007 | 27 March 2025 |
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 24 GB |
Chip lithography | 80 nm | 5 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 20 Watt | 95 Watt |
NVS 320M has 375% lower power consumption.
RTX 5090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14108.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 17 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.
The GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 320M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.