Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs Quadro NVS 320M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1224not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.85no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG84no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date9 June 2007 (17 years ago)31 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3240
Core clock speed575 MHzno data
Number of transistors289 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate9.200no data
Floating-point processing power0.0736 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-HEno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 June 2007 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 53 Watt

NVS 320M has 165% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 320M and M3 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 320M is a mobile workstation card while Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 320M
Quadro NVS 320M
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 320M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 253 votes

Rate M3 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.