ATI Radeon X600 SE vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 295 with Radeon X600 SE, including specs and performance data.

NVS 295
2009
256 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.26
+117%

NVS 295 outperforms ATI X600 SE by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13931486
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.860.25
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 9 (2003−2006)
GPU code nameG98RV370
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)1 September 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz325 MHz
Number of transistors210 million107 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt36 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3201.300
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs44
TMUs84

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 295 0.26
+117%
ATI X600 SE 0.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 295 111
+127%
ATI X600 SE 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.26 0.12
Recency 7 May 2009 1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 36 Watt

NVS 295 has a 116.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 69.2% more advanced lithography process, and 56.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro NVS 295 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X600 SE in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X600 SE is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
ATI Radeon X600 SE
Radeon X600 SE

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 19 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 6 votes

Rate Radeon X600 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Radeon X600 SE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.