ATI Radeon 9600 TX vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 295 with Radeon 9600 TX, including specs and performance data.

NVS 295
2009, $55
256 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.27
+575%

NVS 295 outperforms 9600 TX by a whopping 575% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking14131552
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameG98R300
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date7 May 2009 (17 years ago)7 October 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz297 MHz
Number of transistors210 million110 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Wattno data
Texture fill rate4.3202.376
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48
TMUs88
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneFloppy

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz270 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s8.64 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort2x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 295 0.27
+575%
ATI 9600 TX 0.04

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 295 113
+528%
Samples: 339
ATI 9600 TX 18
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 0.04
Recency 7 May 2009 7 October 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

NVS 295 has a 575% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 131% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro NVS 295 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 9600 TX in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 295 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9600 TX is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon 9600 TX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Radeon 9600 TX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.