RTX PRO 6000 vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 295 and RTX PRO 6000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

NVS 295
2009, $55
256 MB GDDR3, 23 Watt
0.27

RTX PRO 6000 outperforms NVS 295 by a whopping 2333% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1412610
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.900.84
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameG98GB202
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)2025 (recently)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores824064
Core clock speed540 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors210 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3201,810
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPS115.8 TFLOPS
ROPs4176
TMUs8752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188
L1 Cacheno data23.5 MB
L2 Cache16 KB128 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length168 mm304 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB96 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.110.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 295 0.27
RTX PRO 6000 6.57
+2333%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 295 111
Samples: 337
RTX PRO 6000 2747
+2375%
Samples: 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 6.57
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 96 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 600 Watt

NVS 295 has 2508.7% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000, on the other hand, has a 2333.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 38300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 295 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000
RTX PRO 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 69 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or RTX PRO 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.