Quadro FX 330 vs Quadro NVS 295

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1406not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.90no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameG98NV37
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date7 May 2009 (16 years ago)28 June 2004 (21 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$54.50 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed540 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors210 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)23 Watt21 Watt
Texture fill rate4.3201.000
Floating-point processing power0.0208 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length168 mm168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed695 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.12 GB/s3.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DisplayPort1x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0a
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.5 (2.1)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 May 2009 28 June 2004
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 23 Watt 21 Watt

NVS 295 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

FX 330, on the other hand, has 9.5% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 295 and Quadro FX 330. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
Quadro NVS 295
NVIDIA Quadro FX 330
Quadro FX 330

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 21 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 295 or Quadro FX 330, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.