UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) vs Quadro NVS 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
210S 280 AGP 280 PCI 280 PCIe 280 SD 285 290 295
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
16EU Mobile 24EU 24EUs (Alder Lake-N) 32EU 32EUs (Alder Lake) 48EU 64EU 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 290 with UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), including specs and performance data.

NVS 290
2007, $149
256 MB DDR2, 21 Watt
0.55

Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) outperforms NVS 290 by a whopping 524% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
NVS 290 NVS 290
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1275777
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency2.01no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG86no data
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date4 October 2007 (18 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed459 MHz1250 MHz
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)21 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.672no data
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2no data
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed400 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-59no data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12_1
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−600%
14
+600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 11
+0%
11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6
+0%
6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 10
+0%
10
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 3
+0%
3
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 7
+0%
7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
+0%
13
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how NVS 290 and UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is 600% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.55 3.43

UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) has a 523.6% higher aggregate performance score.

The UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 290 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290
Intel UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
vs
Iris Graphics 550 Iris Graphics 550
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
FX 570 Quadro FX 570
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
UHD Graphics 24EU Graphics 24EU
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
UHD Graphics 32EU Graphics 32EU
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB
NVS 290 Quadro NVS 290
vs
UHD Graphics 16EU Mobile Graphics 16EU Mobile
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
vs
FX 5200 Rev. 2 FX 5200 Rev. 2
FX 1700 Quadro FX 1700
vs
H100 SXM5 94 GB SXM5 94 GB
FX 370 Quadro FX 370
vs
GT 120M Mac Edition GT 120M Mac Edition
FX 570 Quadro FX 570
vs
HD 8550M HD 8550M
FX 570 Quadro FX 570
vs
R5 M230 Rebrand R5 M230 Rebrand

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 15 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 290 or UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.