GeForce FX 5200 vs Quadro NVS 290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro NVS 290 with GeForce FX 5200, including specs and performance data.

NVS 290
2007
256 MB DDR2, 21 Watt
0.52
+2500%

NVS 290 outperforms FX 5200 by a whopping 2500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12671551
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency2.00no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG86NV18 C1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date4 October 2007 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $69.99

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed459 MHz250 MHz
Number of transistors210 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.6721.000
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42
TMUs84
L2 Cache16 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

NVS 290 0.52
+2500%
FX 5200 0.02

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 290 228
+3157%
Samples: 368
FX 5200 7
Samples: 414

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.52 0.02
Recency 4 October 2007 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

NVS 290 has a 2500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro NVS 290 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce FX 5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200
GeForce FX 5200

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 297 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 290 or GeForce FX 5200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.